Landscape attributes and life history variability shape genetic structure of trout populations in a stream network

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A brief guide to Landscape Genetics (2006, background): “The special section is complemented by three contributed research papers describing applications of landscape genetics in animals, (i.e.,) an insect (Holzhauer et al. 2006), a fish (Neville et al. 2006) and a mammal (Broquet et al. 2006).”
Potential Consequences of Climate Change to Persistence of Cutthroat Trout Populations (2009, background): “1 [Article] tions also are at increased risk of extinction because of demographic and genetic factors associated with their reduced population sizes and loss of interpopulation connectivity (Neville et al. 2006b).”
Genetic variation and effective population size in isolated populations of coastal cutthroat trout (2010, background): “Genetic effects of stream barriers have been observed to include loss of genetic diversity in and increased genetic differentiation of above-barrier populations (Angers et al. 1999; Bouza et al. 1999; Carlsson and Nilsson 1999; Costello et al. 2003; Taylor et al. 2003; Wofford et al. 2005; Neville e”
Methods for Assessing Fish Populations (2010, methodology): “In the study by Neville et al. (2006b), the authors collected small fin clips from over 1,100 individuals and used variability at DNA microsatellite markers to assess population connectivity, size, and stability, and the potential for migratory life history diversity in one (Box continues) 1 Trout…”