Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae)

By D. Kreyer, Alexander Oed, K. Walther-Hellwig, R. Frankl. 2004

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6885fe7a7657c949c0ccdee4d9d4639716719e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Insect Science

Citations in the corpus

Pollinator webs, plant communities and the conservation of rare plants: arable weeds as a case study (2006, background): “However, Bombus pascuorum appears to prefer resources closer to the nest, if they are available (Kreyer et al. 2004), and is thought to stay mainly within 500 m of the nest (Walther-Hellwig & Frankl 2000).”
Putting the ‘landscape’ in landscape genetics (2007, background): “Therefore, barrier identification has important implications for ecological (Walker et al., 2003; Kreyer et al., 2004; Funk et al., 2005), conservation (Bhattacharya et al., 2003; Miller and Waits, 2003; Dodd et al., 2004) and evolutionary (Castella et al., 2000; Broderick et al., 2003; Cicero,…”
The effect of grazing on bumblebees in the high rangelands of the eastern Tibetan Plateau of Sichuan (2008, background): “…to fly longer distances to their food resources when the foraging habitats are broken into fragments (Goverde et al. 2002), but field observations describe bumblebees foraging over distances of only a few hundred metres (Osborne et al. 1999; Walther-Hellwig and Frankl 2000; Kreyer et al. 2004).”
Invasion Status and Potential Ecological Impacts of an Invasive Alien Bumblebee, Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Naturalized in Southern Hokkaido, Japan (2004, background): “The adaptations include: earlier seasonal emergence, particularly of queens (Sladen, 1912; Prys-Jones & Corbet, 1991), longer mean foraging distances (Walther-Hellwig & Frankl, 2000; Ne’eman et al., 2000; Kreyer et al., 2004), and a variety of effectual behavioral skills for nectar and pollen gather”
How well do we understand landscape effects on pollinators and pollination services (2012, background): “…types of land use can create sites with different degrees of connectivity or even barriers that impede animal movement through the landscape (Kreyer et al. 2004; Ekroos et al. 2008; Ricketts et al. 2008), which can strongly modify pollinator flows and consequently the success of…”
Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. (2007, unknown): “The response of bee individuals, populations and communities to land-use change is largely driven by the spatial and temporal distribution of ﬂoral, nesting and over-wintering”
Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest (2017, background): “Research has shown that stretches of forest habitat are not effective barriers to certain eusocial (Kreyer et al., 2004) and solitary (Zurbuchen et al., 2010) bees.”
Factors and mechanisms explaining spatial heterogeneity: a review of methods for insect populations (2011, methodology): “Sampling methods include direct observation, capture– mark–recapture (Kreyer et al. 2004), radiotelemetry (Vinatier et al. 2010), or interception trapping using pitfall traps (Botes et al. 2006), trunk traps (Rodeghiero & Battisti 2000), 2010 The Authors.”