The importance of colony structure versus shoot morphology for the water balance of 22 subarctic bryophyte species

By T. Elumeeva, Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia, H. During, J. H. C. Cornelissen. 2011

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a67ebeb543e0724bb8261c3fac1497351f073cf7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. J. H. C. Cornelissen

In Ecology

1. Peter M. van Bodegom
2. J. H. C. Cornelissen
3. J. Norberg
4. R. Lindborg
5. H. Rydin

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. H. C. Cornelissen
2. Peter M. van Bodegom
3. J. Norberg
4. R. Lindborg
5. H. Rydin
6. K. Hylander
7. S. Lavorel

Citations in the corpus

• Dominant bryophyte control over high‐latitude soil temperature fluctuations predicted by heat transfer traits, field moisture regime and laws of thermal insulation (2013, background): “Neither does our study enable us to assess whether bryophyte field moisture content is mainly due to species traits regulating their water retention capacity (Elumeeva et al. 2011) or mainly to site topography and hydrology.”
• Towards a trait‐based ecology of wetland vegetation (2017, background): “For whole canopy water retention, we expect positive effects of extracellular capillary and water holding capacity, shoot density and biomass per area, and negative effects of moss canopy height (Elumeeva et al. 2011; Michel et al. 2012).”