A Detailed Assessment of Global Nickel Resource Trends and Endowments

By G. Mudd, S. Jowitt. 2013

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Building and Construction, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a66b626bd7bfcb8af608857a992b40994a4b9320

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. T. Werner
2. S. Jowitt
3. G. Mudd

In Building and Construction

1. S. Jowitt
2. T. Werner
3. G. Mudd

In Mechanical Engineering

1. T. Werner
2. G. Mudd
3. S. Jowitt

Citations in the corpus

• Reviewing the availability of copper and nickel for future generations. The balance between production growth, sustainability and recycling rates (2020, unknown): “…(US Geological Survey, 2018a), - 6400 Mt (Singer, 2017), - >1781 Mt (Northy et al., 2014), - 2459 Mt (Schodde, 2010), - 1861 Mt (Jowitt and Mudd, 2014) - 2800 Mt (Sverdrup et al., 2014) A thorough assessment of US copper resources in 1998 indicated 540,000 kt of copper in the upper 1 km…”
• The world's by-product and critical metal resources part III: A global assessment of indium (2017, result): “For example, reports in 2007 suggested that In resources would deplete in only 10 years (Cohen, 2007), yet this study, as well as a later study by Moyer (2010) relied on misinterpretations of data originally published by the USGS (see Mudd and Jowitt, 2014).”