Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector
By D. D. Florian, Christophe Grojean, Fabio Maltoni, C. Mariotti, A. Nikitenko, M. Pieri, P. Savard, M. Schumacher, R. Tanaka, R. Aggleton and 364 more. 2016
1,088 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a66494fed2d718ec7a4c43cb42bb13e2f22ba66a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Hardware and Architecture
Citations in the corpus
- Accelerating Science with Generative Adversarial Networks: An Application to 3D Particle Showers in Multilayer Calorimeters. (2017, methodology): “The ATLAS and CMS experiments are expected to observe about 10(8) Higgs boson events [9], buried in ∼10(17) background events [10,11].”
- Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at s=13$$ \sqrt{s}=13 $$ TeV (2017, methodology): “The measured cross sections, normalized to the SM prediction [34], which is denoted as σtheo, are shown in Fig.”
- Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment (2023, neutral): “Background modelling uncertainties are considered to be un-correlated in order to reflect improvements in the MC simulation tools and general theory predictions that have evolved significantly since Run 1, both on the side of the hard process simulation and on the side of the parton shower and…”
- Search for doubly charged Higgs boson production in multi-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepac (2017, background): “The variation is 6% for diboson production [77], 13% for t t W production, 12% for t t Z production, and 8% for t t H production [49].”
- Updated global SMEFT fit to Higgs, diboson and electroweak data (2018, methodology): “[115] are also included in the context of template cross sections (STXS) as described in Ref.”