Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making

2002

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a661a757dc50b620279dca1fd6a352edece5b789

Citations in the corpus

• Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making (2007, unknown): “Thus, it is very suitable to express the DM’s preference values with the use of intuitionistic fuzzy values rather than exact numerical values or linguistic variables [28,46,47,61].”
• Intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making (2010, unknown): “Further, Szmidt and Kacprzyk (2002) proposed some solution concepts such as the intuitionistic fuzzy core and consen- ll rights reserved. l Science Foundation of China sus winner in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, and proposed a method to aggregate the…”
• Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making (2008, unknown): “Szmidt and Kacprzyk [10] proposed some solution concepts such as the intuitionistic fuzzy core and consensus winner in group decision making with intuitionistic (individual and social) fuzzy preference relations, and proposed a method to aggregate the individual intuitionistic fuzzy preference…”
• Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making (2007, unknown): “…2001), and has been applied in different fields, including decision making (Atanassov, Pasi & Yager, 2005; Chen & Tan, 1994; Hong & Choi, 2000; Szmidt & Kacprzyk, 2002; Xu & Ronald, 2006), logic programming (Atanassov & Georgiev, 1993), medical diagnosis (De et al., 2001), etc. Gau & Buehrer…”
• Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations (2012, unknown): “MADM problems are widespread in real-life decision situations [6], [9], [36], [46], [52].”
• Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group (2009, unknown): “Szmidt and Kacprzyk (2002) first generalized the fuzzy preference relation to the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation.”
• An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights (2009, unknown): “For instance, attribute values have been relaxed to be a range rather than an exact value [4,6,14,18,20,22,27–30,33–35,38], and incomplete attribute weight information has also been extensively investigated from different perspectives [18,26,36].”
• Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making (2011, unknown): “…Gau et al., 1993; Grzegorzewski, 2004; Hong & Choi, 2000; Li, 2004; Li, 2005, 2008; Li & Cheng, 2002; Lin, Yuan, & Xia, 2007; Liu, 2007; Li, Wang, Liu, & Shan, 2009; Szmidt & Kacprzyk, 1996a, 1996b, 1996c, 1997, 2000, 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2003; Tan & Chen, 2010; Wang, 2009; Wei, 2008; Ye, 2009b).”
• GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting (2010, unknown): “Szmidt and Kacprzyk [16] proposed some solution concepts in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, such as intuitionistic fuzzy core and consensus winner, etc.”