The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. VI. Discovery and Analysis of a Double Einstein Ring

By R. Gavazzi, T. Treu, Leon V. E. Koopmans, A. Bolton, L. A. Moustakas, S. Burles, P. J. Marshall. 2008

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We report the discovery of two concentric Einstein rings around the gravitational lens SDSS J0946+1006. The main lens is at redshift zl = 0.222, while the inner ring (1) is at redshift zs1 = 0.609 (REin 1 = 1.43″ ± 0.01″). The wider image separation (REin 2 = 2.07″± 0.02″) of the outer ring (2) implies a higher redshift than that of ring 1; the detection of ring 2 in the F814W ACS filter implies an upper limit of zs2≲ 6.9. The main lens can be described by a power-law total mass density profile ρtot ∝ r−γ′ with γ′ = 2.00 ± 0.03 and velocity dispersion σSIE = 287 ± 5 km s−1 (the stellar velocity dispersion is σv,* = 284 ± 24 km s−1). The strong lensing configuration is inconsistent with light traces mass. Adopting a prior on the stellar mass-to-light ratio from previous SLACS work, we infer a 73% ± 9% dark matter fraction within the cylinder of radius equal to the effective radius of the lens. We find that, for the case of SDSS J0946+1006, the geometry of the two rings does not place interesting constraints on cosmography because of the suboptimal redshifts of lens and sources. We then consider the perturbing effect of the mass associated with ring 1 building a compound lens model. This introduces minor changes to the mass of the main lens and provides an estimate of zs2 = 3.1+ 2.0−1.0 and of the mass of the source responsible for ring 1 (σSIE ,s1 = 94+ 27−47 km s−1). We conclude by examining the prospects of doing cosmography with a sample of 50 double rings, expected from future space-based surveys. Accounting for uncertainties in the mass profile of the lens and the effects of the perturber, we find that such a sample would constrain Ωm and w within 10%, assuming flatness.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a653c915b9a9e1ed10a95b33ae0bab0fa5f8350a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. T. Treu
  2. M. Cappellari
  3. Leon V. E. Koopmans
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. P. J. Marshall
  7. C. Conroy
  8. C. Casey

In Instrumentation

  1. T. Treu
  2. M. Cappellari
  3. Leon V. E. Koopmans
  4. T. Collett
  5. P. J. Marshall
  6. C. Conroy
  7. Dominique Sluse
  8. M. Auger

Citations in the corpus