Asymptotics for panel quantile regression models with individual effects
By Kengo Kato, Antonio F. Galvao, Gabriel Montes-Rojas. 2012
217 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a63633caa686828b31d292cd6ed617f4adb7541c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Bryan S. Graham
- Jinyong Hahn
- Jorge E. Galán
- J. Machado
- J.M.C. Santos Silva
- J. Powell
- Alexandre Poirier
- David Powell
In Statistics and Probability
- Bryan S. Graham
- J. Powell
- David Powell
- Alexandre Poirier
- Guido W. Imbens
- J. Machado
- J.M.C. Santos Silva
- Jinyong Hahn
Citations in the corpus
- Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects (2022, methodology): “…data estimators with additive fixed effects, including Koenker (2004), Harding and Lamarche (2009), Lamarche (2010), Canay (2011), Besstremyannaya and Golovan (2019), Galvao (2011), Ponomareva (2011), Kato et al. (2012), Rosen (2012), Galvao and Wang (2015), and Machado and Santos Silva (2019).”
- Quantiles via moments (2019, methodology): “As noted by Hahn and Newey (2004), the fact that the variance of the estimator depends on n but the bias does not, may lead to confidence intervals with poor coverage in applications where n/T is large (see also Kato, Galvão, and Montes-Rojas, 2012).”
- A quantile correlated random coefficients panel data model (2016, background): “As in the regular case our estimate is the solution to (32).”
- The benefits are at the tail: Uncovering the impact of macroprudential policy on growth-at-risk (2020, background): “Kato et al. (2012) study how the relationship between the size of N and T is key to guarantee unbiased and asymptotic estimates in panel quantile regressions with individual effects, finding that the main problems arise when T is small.”