Potential benefits of an adaptive forward collision warning system
By A. Jamson, Frank C. H. Lai, Oliver M. J. Carsten. 2008
160 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a62c5f4931d3141c93045df404ba547e1b90c69c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Citations in the corpus
- Drivers’ rear end collision avoidance behaviors under different levels of situational urgency (2016, background): “On the other hand, the earlier a warning occurs, the more likely it is to be interpreted as a false alarm, which in turn leads to a reduction in drivers’ future system use (Jamson et al., 2008). FCW systems apply assumptions describing driver response time and braking intensity to determine when an ”
- Auditory interfaces in automated driving: an international survey (2015, unknown): “-1 = I prefer not to respond, 1 = 0, 2 = 1, 3 = 2, 4 = 3, 5 = 4, 6 = 5, 7 = More than 5 Vangered Q7 How often do you do the following?”