The `LEP paradox'
By R. Barbieri, Alessandro Strumia. 2000
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Is there a Higgs? Where is it? Is supersymmetry there? Where is it? By discussing these questions, we call attention to the `LEP paradox', which is how we see the naturalness problem of the Fermi scale after a decade of electroweak precision measurements, mostly done at LEP.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a61305b18867874e14f4d32f12502edb32e6765f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
In Political Science and International Relations
- S. Dimopoulos
- N. Arkani-Hamed
- Hsin-Chia Cheng
- Cms Collaboration
- G. Villadoro
- G. Giudice
- Andrei Linde
- N. Craig
Citations in the corpus
- SUSY Quivers, Intersecting Branes and the Modest Hierarchy Problem (2002, unknown): “J H E P Contents”
- Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC (2004, background): “Meanwhile, the absence of a light Higgs at LEPII has raised new problems, necessitating tunings at the few percent level for electroweak symmetry breaking [41].”
- A Quirky Little Higgs Model (2008, background): “1 Introduction With new data from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) imminent it would be ideal if all possible solutions for the little hierarchy problem of the Standard Model (SM) [1] had been classified and their LHC phenomenology at least qualitatively explored.”
- On the tuning and the mass of the composite Higgs (2012, unknown): “[13] we have δm(2)h = 3 √ 2π2 GFm 2 tΛ 2 ⇒ ∆ ≥ δm 2 h m(2)h = ( Λ 400 GeV )2( 125 GeV mh )2 .”