Synoptic relationships between surface Chlorophyll- a and diagnostic pigments specific to phytoplankton functional types

By Takafumi Hirata, N. Hardman-Mountford, R. Brewin, J. Aiken, R. Barlow, Koji Suzuki, Tomonori Isada, Evan A. Howell, T. Hashioka, M. Noguchi-Aita and 1 more. 2011

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract. Error-quantified, synoptic-scale relationships between chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) and phytoplankton pigment groups at the sea surface are presented. A total of ten pigment groups were considered to represent three Phytoplankton Size Classes (PSCs, micro-, nano- and picoplankton) and seven Phytoplankton Functional Types (PFTs, i.e. diatoms, dinoflagellates, green algae, prymnesiophytes (haptophytes), pico-eukaryotes, prokaryotes and Prochlorococcus sp.). The observed relationships between Chl-a and PSCs/PFTs were well-defined at the global scale to show that a community shift of phytoplankton at the basin and global scales is reflected by a change in Chl-a of the total community. Thus, Chl-a of the total community can be used as an index of not only phytoplankton biomass but also of their community structure. Within these relationships, we also found non-monotonic variations with Chl-a for certain pico-sized phytoplankton (pico-eukaryotes, Prokaryotes and Prochlorococcus sp.) and nano-sized phytoplankton (Green algae, prymnesiophytes). The relationships were quantified with a least-square fitting approach in order to enable an estimation of the PFTs from Chl-a where PFTs are expressed as a percentage of the total Chl-a. The estimated uncertainty of the relationships depends on both PFT and Chl-a concentration. Maximum uncertainty of 31.8% was found for diatoms at Chl-a = 0.49 mg m−3. However, the mean uncertainty of the relationships over all PFTs was 5.9% over the entire Chl-a range observed in situ (0.02

Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6112b658d90b743be68d63b3e9a812c107d8dda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Michael J. Follows
  2. Bess Ward
  3. S. Dutkiewicz
  4. O. Jahn
  5. Fanny M. Monteiro
  6. P. Cermeño
  7. Anna Hickman
  8. Darcy A. A. Taniguchi

In Oceanography

  1. Bess Ward
  2. S. Dutkiewicz
  3. Michael J. Follows
  4. O. Jahn
  5. Fanny M. Monteiro
  6. P. Cermeño
  7. Anna Hickman
  8. Darcy A. A. Taniguchi

Citations in the corpus