Behavioral Economics and Public Policy 102: Beyond Nudging

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Administrative Easing: Rule Reduction and Medicaid Enrollment (2019, background): “The reforms to enrollment processes that enabled the expansion were largely precipitated by insights from behavioral economics that have increasingly gained traction in mainstream and applied policy practice (e.g., Blavin, Dorn, and Dev 2014; Chetty 2015; Bhargava and Loewenstein 2015).”
Debiasing Decisions (2015, background): “…and choices is not always helpful, particularly when it makes decisions too complex to comprehend, existing biases encourage good behavior, or people recognize the choices they need to make but fail to implement them because they lack self-control (Bhargava & Loewenstein, 2015; Fox & Sitkin, 2015).”
Moving beyond the obsession with nudging individual behaviour: Towards a broader understanding of Behavioural Public Policy (2020, methodology): “According to the conceptual strand of criticism, nudges are an inappropriate method of addressing complex policy problems adequately (Bhargava and Loewenstein, 2015).”
A Review of Nudges: Definitions, Justifications, Effectiveness (2020, unknown): “According to some scholars (e.g., Banerjee & John, 2021; Bhargava & Loewenstein, 2015; Loewenstein & Chater, 2017), in fact, nudges can be used to enhance the design and effectiveness of standard policies, and vice versa, resulting in what are termed “hybrid” (Loewenstein & Chater, 2017) or…”