Influence of environmental preference and environment type congruence on judgments of restoration potential
By S. Wilkie, A. Stavridou. 2013
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5f8bc5c88d3d2e537c7c1e86c064d8c3e84d9e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Sociology and Political Science
In Speech and Hearing
Citations in the corpus
- Attention Restoration Theory: Exploring the Role of Soft Fascination and Mental Bandwidth (2019, background): “Given the host of published studies that rely on PRSbased measures (e.g., Ivarsson & Hagerhall, 2008; Laumann et al., 2001; Purcell et al., 2001; Staats et al., 2016; Wilkie & Stavridou, 2013), the biasing effect of preference in assessing perceived restoration is cause for concern.”
- Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? (2014, methodology): “To learn more about the causal direction of the relationship etween perceived naturalness and recovery of vitality, future esearch could measure perceptions of naturalness in advance of he experimental treatment, e.g. by means of a photo perception tudy (see Wilkie & Stavridou, 2013).”