Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance

By L. M. Beebe, M. C. Cummings. 2006

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5df821046cf0b7433ffacf6e681de270d40539c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Andrew Sangpil Byon
2. Eva Ogiermann

Citations in the corpus

• Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests (2009, background): “…constitute idealized and normative data, they reliably illustrate the pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic norms of the respondent’s culture (Beebe and Cummings 1996: 75; and Kasper 2000: 329) and provide valuable pragmatic input that can help the foreign language learner “approach the…”
• The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests (2006, background): “nally developed by Blum-Kulka (1982) and have distinct advantages over other speech act data gathering methods (Beebe and Cummings 1985; Rose 1992).”