Residual Stress in Metal Additive Manufacturing

By C. Li, Z. Y. Liu, X. Fang, Yuebin B. Guo. 2018

618 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) has been widely used to fabricate functional metal parts in automobile, aerospace, energy, and medical device industries due to its flexible process capacity including complex geometry, functional graded materials, and free usage of tool. For the two major categories of metal additive manufacturing processes include powder bed fusion (PBF) and directed energy deposition (DED), parts are fabricated through melting of feed stock materials in the form of either powders or wires directly from a CAD model. The unique thermal cycle of metal additive manufacturing is characterized by: (1) rapid heating rate due to high energy intensity with steep temperature gradients; (2) rapid solidification with high cooling rates due to the small volume of melt pool; and (3) melt-back involving simultaneous melting of the top powder layer and re-melting of underlying previously solidified layers. Residual stress caused by the unique thermal cycle in AM is the critical issue for the fabricated metal parts since the steep residual stress gradients generate part distortion which dramatically deteriorate functionality of the end-use parts. This paper comprehensively assessed the current research status on residual stress sources, characteristics, and mitigation. First, the relationship between residual stress and microstructure is highlighted in AM metal parts. Then, the measurement methods and characteristics of residual stress in both as-build metal parts and post-processed ones were summarized. Third, residual stress mitigation and control methods including in-situ and post-process control methods were thoroughly discussed. Furthermore, future work directions are provided in this work.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5ddb3a78fbf67a434b5584bc52aa47f10ce5de1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

  1. A. H. Ettefagh
  2. Shengmin Guo
  3. J. Raush

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. A. H. Ettefagh
  2. Shengmin Guo
  3. J. Raush

Citations in the corpus