Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: Ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes

By S. Jang. 2013

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Influencing Climate Change Attitudes in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020, background): “…and Zhu (2018) Study 1 Journal article MTurk 35.02 83.00% 54.18% Jamelske (2017) Sample 1 Unpublished data SSI Sample 2 Unpublished data Students Jang (2013) Study 1 Journal article Qualtrics Panel 45.33 53.00% Joireman, Barnes Truelove, and Duell (2010) Study 2 Journal article Students 21.00…”
Compassion for climate change victims and support for mitigation policy (2016, background): “Researchers have sought to address these communication barriers by examining how different ways of framing the causes and impacts of climate change (e.g., attribution of responsibility, social distance, etc.) can shape individuals' attitudes and behaviors (e.g., Hart & Nisbet, 2012; Jang, 2013).”
Why do youth participate in climate activism? A mixed-methods investigation of the #FridaysForFuture climate protests. (2021, background): “This belief could be related to causal respon ibility (Jang, 2013), but is conceptually different (i.e., acknowledgement of the problem versus attribution of blame).”
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “The attribution to natural or human causation of climate change, however, may vary depending on whether one perceives one’s own or another country as more responsible (Jang, 2013).”