Three Concerns With Applying a Bifactor Model as a Structure of Psychopathology

By Wes Bonifay, S. Lane, S. Reise. 2017

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5b97b0e83ca17c9ae88946f8c0505f3678595dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Ashley L. Watts
2. I. Waldman
3. Holly E. Poore

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ashley L. Watts
2. I. Waldman
3. Holly E. Poore

Citations in the corpus

• Riskier Tests of the Validity of the Bifactor Model of Psychopathology (2019, methodology): “In this way, bifactor models of psychopathology may be placing undue burden on the data (Bonifay, 2015; Bonifay et al., 2017; Reise et al., 2016), in turn compromising the integrity of either the general or specific factors.”
• All for one and one for all: Mental disorders in one dimension (2018, neutral): “reveal—the causes of the correlations (34, 35).”