An interaction-motif-based scoring function for protein-ligand docking
By Zhong-Ru Xie, Ming-Jing Hwang. 2010
44 citations recorded by the source corpus.
BackgroundA good scoring function is essential for molecular docking computations. In conventional scoring functions, energy terms modeling pairwise interactions are cumulatively summed, and the best docking solution is selected. Here, we propose to transform protein-ligand interactions into three-dimensional geometric networks, from which recurring network substructures, or network motifs, are selected and used to provide probability-ranked interaction templates with which to score docking solutions.ResultsA novel scoring function for protein-ligand docking, MotifScore, was developed. It is non-energy-based, and docking is, instead, scored by counting the occurrences of motifs of protein-ligand interaction networks constructed using structures of protein-ligand complexes. MotifScore has been tested on a benchmark set established by others to assess its ability to identify near-native complex conformations among a set of decoys. In this benchmark test, 84% of the highest-scored docking conformations had root-mean-square deviations (rmsds) below 2.0 Å from the native conformation, which is comparable with the best of several energy-based docking scoring functions. Many of the top motifs, which comprise a multitude of chemical groups that interact simultaneously and make a highly significant contribution to MotifScore, capture recurrent interacting patterns beyond pairwise interactions.ConclusionsWhile providing quite good docking scores, MotifScore is quite different from conventional energy-based functions. MotifScore thus represents a new, network-based approach for exploring problems associated with molecular docking.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Molecular Biology
In Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery
Citations in the corpus
- Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies (2015, neutral): “…AutoDock [34] SMoG [82] AutoDock [34] GlideScore [37] DrugScore [62] GoldScore [35] ChemScore [60] PMF_Score [83] ICM [46] X_Score [66] MotifScore [84] LigandFit [47] F_Score [73] RF_Score [85] Molegro Virtual Docker [48] Fresno [75] PESD_SVM [86] SYBYL_G-Score [73] SCORE [76] PoseScore [87]…”
- Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010–2011 in review (2013, background): “MotifScore [84] was introduced to tally motifs of protein – ligand interaction networks constructed from experimental structures.”