Corporate governance and company performance in Australia

By Jacqueline Christensen, P. Kent, J. Stewart. 2010

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Examining the influence of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency: Evidence from top service firms in Australia (2015, result): “The findings of the time trends analysis on the independent variables are consistentwith previous studies on corporate governance inAustralia (Henry, 2008; Christensen et al., 2010).”
The Influence of Institutional and Government Ownership on Firm Performance: Evidence from Kuwait (2012, methodology): “Tobin’s Q as a market-based measure of firm performance is consistent with the efficient market hypothesis in which the market valuation of a firm measures the use of existing assets and future growth potential (Christensen et al., 2010).”
Corporate governance and intellectual capital disclosure (2016, background): “Alternatively, executive directors’ superior knowledge of the firm might lead to better decision making (Christensen et al., 2010) and therefore fewer independent directors on the board would be expected to be associated with superior financial performance and thus greater ICD (Li et al., 2008).”
Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom (2020, methodology): “Tobin’s Q also captures investors’ expectations to future events, including evaluation of current business strategies (Rose-Ackerman, 1973; Demsetz and Villalonga, 2001; Ehikioya, 2009; Christensen et al., 2010; Rodriguez-Fernandez, 2016).”