Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
By M. Paasche-Orlow, H. Taylor, F. Brancati. New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
720 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a54fdba76b18fbd6ddf7dae5512ea7f2800d83d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- The Principles of Readability. (2004, background): “…dental health information (Alexander 2000), palliative-care information (Payne et al. 2000), research consent forms (Hochhauser 2002; Mathew 2002; Paasche-Orlow et al. 2003), informed consent forms (Williams et al. 2003) online health information (Oermann and Wilson 2000), lead-poison brochures…”
- Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content (2012, methodology): “Readability tests have been used to study the qualitative characteristics of several types of text in different are as of information science, and a large set of readability indexes has been developed over the years (Paasche-Orlow et al. 2003).”
- Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments (2012, background): “An example of review posted by the characteristics of several types of texts [14,25,32].”