Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels.
By C. Avio, S. Gorbi, M. Milan, M. Benedetti, D. Fattorini, G. d’Errico, M. Pauletto, L. Bargelloni, F. Regoli. Environmental Pollution, 2015
1,207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Microplastics represent a growing environmental concern for the oceans due to their potential of adsorbing chemical pollutants, thus representing a still unexplored source of exposure for aquatic organisms. In this study polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) microplastics were shown to adsorb pyrene with a time and dose-dependent relationship. Results also indicated a marked capability of contaminated microplastics to transfer this model PAH to exposed mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis; tissue localization of microplastics occurred in haemolymph, gills and especially digestive tissues where a marked accumulation of pyrene was also observed. Cellular effects included alterations of immunological responses, lysosomal compartment, peroxisomal proliferation, antioxidant system, neurotoxic effects, onset of genotoxicity; changes in gene expression profile was also demonstrated through a new DNA microarray platform. The study provided the evidence that microplastics adsorb PAHs, emphasizing an elevated bioavailability of these chemicals after the ingestion, and the toxicological implications due to responsiveness of several molecular and cellular pathways to microplastics.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ocean Engineering, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a53ed638ef60afa3224423daa3780b4b2585ce15
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Ocean Engineering
In Pollution
Citations in the corpus
- Microplastics in mussels along the coastal waters of China. (2016, background): “Mussels are the most common benthic species used for studying the fate and toxic effects of microplastics in laboratory (Browne et al., 2008; von Moos et al., 2012; Farrell and Nelson, 2013; Watts et al., 2014; Avio et al., 2015).”
- Understanding How Microplastics Affect Marine Biota on the Cellular Level Is Important for Assessing Ecosystem Function: A Review (2019, background): “galloprovincialis microplastic caused DNA damages (Avio et al. 2015).”
- Plastics and microplastics in the oceans: From emerging pollutants to emerged threat. (2017, background): “…the effects of a different distribution of microplastics in the marine environment, where floating microplastics are commonly aggregated in patches (elevated density but irregular spatial distribution), while sinking particles are more homogeneously distributed in sediments (Avio et al., 2015b).”
- Marine litter plastics and microplastics and their toxic chemicals components: the need for urgent preventive measures (2018, background): “In mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis, exposed to microplastics (polyethylene and polystyrene) contaminated with polyaromatic hydrocarbons, marked bioaccumulation of these chemicals was recorded in both digestive gland and gills [26]; similarly in tidal flat organisms such as lugworms, Arenicola mar”
- Sampling, Isolating and Identifying Microplastics Ingested by Fish and Invertebrates * (2017, neutral): “2–3 weeks Fish Foekema et al. (2013)75 KOH (10”
- Feasting on microplastics: ingestion by and effects on marine organisms (2018, background): “Moreover, the ingestion of small plastic particles that ad - sorb marine chemical contaminants presents a probable path for the entrance of organic pollutants into the marine food web, with the possibility of bioaccumulation and biomagnification at higher trophic levels (Avio et al. 2015).”
- Experimental development of a new protocol for extraction and characterization of microplastics in fish tissues: First observations in commercial species from Adriatic Sea. (2015, methodology): “The exposure concentration s not representative of a realistic 211 environmental condition, although nearly fifty times lower than those previously used in other 212 experimental studies (i.e. Thompson et al., in 2004; Van Moos et al., 2012; Avio et al., 2015).”