The happiness–income paradox revisited

By Richard A. Easterlin, Laura McVey, M. Switek, Onnicha Sawangfa, Jacqueline Zweig. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010

1,095 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The striking thing about the happiness–income paradox is that over the long-term —usually a period of 10 y or more—happiness does not increase as a country's income rises. Heretofore the evidence for this was limited to developed countries. This article presents evidence that the long term nil relationship between happiness and income holds also for a number of developing countries, the eastern European countries transitioning from socialism to capitalism, and an even wider sample of developed countries than previously studied. It also finds that in the short-term in all three groups of countries, happiness and income go together, i.e., happiness tends to fall in economic contractions and rise in expansions. Recent critiques of the paradox, claiming the time series relationship between happiness and income is positive, are the result either of a statistical artifact or a confusion of the short-term relationship with the long-term one.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a530ef34f4ae019091772d1347982798f5a643a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Francesco Sarracino
  2. J. Martínez-Alier
  3. S. Giljum
  4. G. Atkinson
  5. G. Kallis
  6. Richard A. Easterlin
  7. W. Lamb
  8. F. Vergunst

In Social Psychology

  1. Richard A. Easterlin
  2. Andrew E. Clark
  3. Francesco Sarracino
  4. Saizi Xiao
  5. M. Asadullah
  6. E. Yeoh
  7. F. Vergunst
  8. R. Veenhoven

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Andrew E. Clark
  2. Richard A. Easterlin
  3. F. Vergunst
  4. Saizi Xiao
  5. M. Asadullah
  6. E. Yeoh
  7. R. Veenhoven
  8. Francesco Sarracino

Citations in the corpus