On Behavioral-Environmental Economics

By Jason F. Shogren, Laura O. Taylor. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a52d4faa75beeb08e6ffaf8df29aab4e9d3760ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Environmental Policy Theory Given Bounded Rationality and Other-regarding Preferences (2011, background): “…in environmental economics on environmental valuation, public goods and the Coase theorem (Bohm 1972; Hoffman and Spitzer 1982; Brookshire et al. 1990), as well as more recent research (List 2006; Shogren and Taylor 2008), explore specific behavioral anomalies in relation to environmental policy.”
The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector (2015, unknown): “Probably the preceding analysis is too limited and requires relaxing these assumptions and incorporating other elements such as informational and behavioral failures (Allcott andMullainathan, 2010; Shogren and Taylor, 2008).”
The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, background): “There is a rise in studies on the behavioral economics of environmental policy in general (Gsottbauer and Bergh, 2011; Noussair and van Soest, 2014; Shogren and Taylor, 2008), and PES in particular (included in the review by Rode et al.”
General Resilience to Cope with Extreme Events (2012, background): “These (and other) behavioral phenomena inevitably affect societal decision making about extreme environmental events [24].”
Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics? (2010, background): “So again, context dependence is not a problem of SP only, but rather a potential problem for welfare evaluations in general; see, e.g., Tversky and Simonson (1993) and Shogren and Taylor (2008).”
Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour (2015, background): “As with much of human behaviour, energy-related practices are often influenced by certain cognitive biases and ‘irrational’ tendencies that, while producing decisions and actions that may be surprising from the standpoint of traditional economic models, are actually rather predictable (and even adap”
The Role of Behavioural Economics in Energy and Climate Policy (2011, unknown): “This is found in contingent valuation studies that show that willingness to accept (WTA) is typically higher than willingness to pay (WTP) (Shogren and Taylor 2008).”
Behavioral Environmental Economics: Promises and Challenges (2014, background): “The literature on behavioral environmental economics is not completely new; there is already a special volume in Environmental and Resource Economics in 2010 on this topic, and a handful of survey papers (Shogren and Taylor 2008, Gowdy 2008, Carlsson and Johansson‐Stenman 2012, Hammitt 2013).”
Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment (2013, background): “In the context of environmental policies and programs, the conceptual and empirical foundations of such strategies remain under-researched (Shogren and Taylor, 2008).”
Consumers and their behavior: state of the art in behavioral science supporting use phase modeling in LCA and ecodesign (2016, background): “…is also true for policies related to sustainable behavior (Bamberg et al. 2011; Ölander and Thøgersen 2014), which is reflected in a number of articles and survey papers (Gowdy 2008; Shogren and Taylor 2008; Peattie 2010; Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman 2012; Hammitt 2013; Croson and Treich 2014).”
Are consumers willing to switch to smart time of use electricity tariffs? The importance of loss-aversion and electric vehicle ownership (2017, background): “This is because loss-aversion has predominantly been measured in laboratory experiments amongst psychology students [27] or inferred from the real-world behaviour of the select group of individuals who participate in the stock market [48–51], individuals who are likely to have very different…”