Inflation Dynamics, Marginal Cost, and the Output Gap: Evidence from Three Countries

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Identifying the Influences of Nominal and Real Rigidities in Aggregate Price-Setting Behavior (2007, unknown): “enumerated here; recent examples include Lind´ e (2001), Neiss and Nelson (2002) , Sondergaard (2003), and Cogley and Sbordone (2004).”
Rethinking Potential Output: Embedding Information About the Financial Cycle (2013, unknown): “These models define potential output as the output that corresponds to fully flexible prices and wages (eg Neiss and Nelson (2005), Basu and Fernald (2009), Justiniano and Primiceri (2008)).”
Understanding the flattening Phillips curve (2010, background): “…that the output gap has been estimated by detrending output; in a new-Keynesian model, potential output typically is defined as the level of output that would prevail under flexible prices, and this may not be approximated well by de-trending output, a point emphasized by Neiss and Nelson (2005).15”
Empirical Evidence on Inflation Expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve (2014, methodology): “Neiss and Nelson (2005) compute the output gap that is implied by a standard New Keynesian model; this theoretically consistent measure turns out to be essentially uncorrelated with quadratically detrended output (which is used by Roberts 1995, and Galí and Gertler 1999), and GIV estimates of the…”