Costs and performance of irrigation projects: A comparison of Sub-Saharan Africa and other developing regions
By A. Inocencio, M. Kikuchi, M. Tonosaki, A. Maruyama, D. Merrey, H. Sally, I. D. Jong. 2007
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a50d25ecec534bd76be97fcbea1fc8edc0a22051
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Calzadilla
- Katrin Rehdanz
- Richard S. J. Tol
- Gert Jan Veldwisch
- David Anthoff
- J. Venot
- Dan Brockington
- H. Komakech
Citations in the corpus
- Do differences in the scale of irrigation projects generate different impacts on poverty and production (2011, result): “Inocencio et al. (2007) review costs of large- and medium-scale projects and find that construction costs were almost twice as large in Sub-Saharan African schemes when compared with other irrigation schemes in other parts of the world.”
- Economywide impacts of climate change on agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: (2013, background): “Although the cost of irrigation projects implemented in developing countries has generally decreased over the last four decades, and performance of irrigation projects has improved (Inocencio et al. 2007), the situation in SubSaharan Africa is different.”
- African farmer-led irrigation development: re-framing agricultural policy and investment? (2017, background): “Various pan-African studies and policy processes ran parallel to each other (Lankford 2005; Inocencio et al. 2007; AfDB et al. 2008; AgWa 2010), while contributing momentum to the development of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), a continent-wide programme developed ”
- Importance of Irrigated Agriculture to the Ethiopian Economy: Capturing the direct net benefits of irrigation (2011, methodology): “Annual replacement cost was computed as initial investment divided by project lifetime (25 years), and the O&M cost was assumed to be 10% of annual replacement cost for small-scale schemes, and 50 years and 5% for medium- and large-scale schemes, respectively (Inocencio et al. 2007).”