Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Soil
By P. Nannipieri, K. Smalla. 2006
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4fbfdb5ac7c23eb7e0cb7b998536c2d07b71c79
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
Citations in the corpus
- Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity (2016, background): “This sorbed DNA can be protected from removal by microbes that use it as a 59 source of transformable genetic material or for nutrition (reviewed in (12)).”
- Interactions Between Xenobiotics and Microbial and Enzymatic Soil Activity (2008, methodology): “Measurements of microbial diversity by DNA-based methods (Muyzer and Smalla, 1998; Nannipieri and Smalla, 2006) are schematized in Figure 3.”
- Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis (2017, methodology): “As an aside, development of such an assay could be useful as corroborating data for determining the fate of nucleic acids in soil and the efficiency and yield of extracted nucleic acids which is important for downstream microbial diversity or gene expression analyses (Bakken and Frostegård 2006).”
- Erratum to The chemical and functional characterization of soil N and its biotic components (2009, background): “Biosensory organisms that can be detected in situ can be used (Nannipieri and Smalla, 2006).”
- Extracellular DNA in soil and sediment: fate and ecological relevance (2009, methodology): “Despite the existence of several methods for the extraction of iDNA from soil (Robe et al. 2003; Bakken and Frostegård 2006; Whitehous and Hannah 2007; Lakay et al. 2007), a few methods have been proposed to extract eDNA from soils and sediments; the latter ones are usually based on the absence of…”