The Role of Non-Farm Incomes in Reducing Rural Poverty and Inequality in China

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does non-farm sector employment reduce rural poverty and vulnerability? Evidence from Vietnam and India (2015, background): “The main idea of treatment effects model is to estimate poverty defined by household consumption per capita for two different regimes (de Janvry et al., 2005) - households participating only in the farm labour market and those participating in both farm and non-farm labour markets.”
Rural Income Generating Activities : A Cross Country Comparison (2007, background): “15 See, for example, Lanjouw, Quizon and Sparrow (2001) for Tanzania, Berdegue et al, (2001) for Chile, Elbers and Lanjouw (2001) for Ecuador, Ferreira and Lanjouw (2001) for Brazil, Winters, Davis and Corral (2002) for Mexico, Corral and Reardon (2001) for Nicaragua, Ruben and Van den Berg (2001) a”
Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints, and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on Rural Households in China (2009, unknown): “This result is consistent with the literature on off-farm labor participation among rural households in China which has found that the level of education attainment affects the ability of households to take advantage of off-farm employment opportunities (e.g., deBrauw, 2002; Zhang et al., 2002; Yang”