Machining Ti–6Al–4V alloy with cryogenic compressed air cooling

By S. Sun, Milan Brandt, Mathew S. Dargusch. 2010

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A new cooling approach with cryogenic compressed air has been developed in order to cool the cutting tool edge during turning of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. The cutting forces, chip morphology and chip temperature were measured and compared with those measured during machining with compressed air cooling and dry cutting conditions. The chip temperature is lower with cryogenic compressed air cooling than those with compressed air cooling and dry machining. The combined effects of reduced friction and chip bending away from the cutting zone as a result of the high-speed air produce a thinner chip with cryogenic compressed air cooling and a thicker chip with compressed air cooling compared to dry machining alone. The marginally higher cutting force associated with the application of cryogenic compressed air compared with dry machining is the result of lower chip temperatures and a higher shear plane angle. The tendency to form a segmented chip is higher when machining with cryogenic compressed air than that with compressed air and dry machining only within the ranges of cutting speed and feed when chip transitions from continuous to the segmented. The effect of cryogenic compressed air on the cutting force and chip formation diminishes with increase in cutting speed and feed rate. The application of both compressed air and cryogenic compressed air reduced flank wear and the tendency to form the chip built-up edge. This resulted in a smaller increase in cutting forces (more significantly in the feed force) after cutting long distance compared with that observed in dry machining.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4ed06b1204adc49c88ee1f8df9aec03b0730fe1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. Guy Littlefair
  2. A. Pramanik
  3. Kapil Kumar Gupta
  4. R. Laubscher

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Guy Littlefair
  2. A. Pramanik
  3. Kapil Kumar Gupta
  4. R. Laubscher

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. Guy Littlefair
  2. A. Pramanik
  3. Kapil Kumar Gupta
  4. R. Laubscher

Citations in the corpus