Simultaneously Leveraging Output and Task Structures for Multiple-Output Regression
By Piyush Rai, Abhishek Kumar, Hal Daumé Iii. 2012
71 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Qiang Yang
- Yu Zhang
- Mingxia Liu
- Ying Wei
- Daoqiang Zhang
- Songcan Chen
- André Ricardo Gonçalves
- Mingsheng Long
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey on Multi-Task Learning (2017, methodology): “The MTRL model is extended in [91] to use the symmetric matrixvariate generalized hyperbolic distribution to learn block sparse structure in W and in [92] to use the matrix generalized inverse Gaussian prior to learn low-rank Ω1 and Ω2.”
- Attribute relation learning for zero-shot classification (2014, methodology): “More recently, this approach has been widely applied to many domains demonstrating its effectiveness, such as multi-task learning [44–48], transfer learning [49], multilabel learning [50,51], and multi-view learning [52].”
- Learning Sparse Task Relations in Multi-Task Learning (2017, methodology): “…trace of Ω but also learns sparse task relations via the penalization of the off-diagonal entries in Ω. Note that problem (3) is different from the methods proposed in (Zhang and Schneider 2010; Rai, Kumar, and Daume 2012) whose g(·) takes the form of g(Ω) = ‖Ω−1‖1 by assuming that Ω−1 is sparse.”
- Multi-task Sparse Structure Learning with Gaussian Copula Models (2016, methodology): “Xue et al. (2007) employed a Dirichlet process prior over the task coefficients to encourage task clustering and the number of clusters was someway automatically determined by the prior.”
- Learning to Multitask (2018, methodology): “The survey [34] has shown that the models proposed in [14, 13, 16, 32, 27, 33] can be formulated as problem (1) with different g ( · ) ’s, where the detailed connections between these works and problem (1) are put in the supplementary material for completeness.”