Constraint-Aware Deep Neural Network Compression
By Changan Chen, Frederick Tung, Naveen Vedula, Greg Mori. 2018
75 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Greg Mori
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Zechun Liu
- Kwang-Ting Cheng
- Frederick Tung
- Mengyao Zhai
- Lei Chen
- Raphael Tang
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Similarity-Preserving Knowledge Distillation (2019, background): “For example, unstructured pruning requires optimized sparse matrix multiplication routines to realize practical acceleration [26], platform constraint-aware compression [2, 36, 37] requires hardware simulators or empirical measurements, and arbitrarybit quantization [9, 17] requires specialized hard”
- Piggyback GAN: Efficient Lifelong Learning for Image Conditioned Generation (2021, background): “In recent years, there has been increasing interest in better aligning the resource consumption of neural networks with the computational constraints of the platforms on which they will be deployed [7,36,38].”
- Distilling Task-Specific Knowledge from BERT into Simple Neural Networks (2019, background): “Thus, others explore pruning entire filters (Li et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017), with some even targeting device-centric metrics, such as floating-point operations (Tang et al., 2018) and latency (Chen et al., 2018).”
- MetaPruning: Meta Learning for Automatic Neural Network Channel Pruning (2019, methodology): “AutoML Recently, AutoML methods [21, 52, 8, 12] take the real-time inference latency on multiple devices into account to iteratively prune channels in different layers of a network via reinforcement learning [21] or an automatic feedback loop [52].”