Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Compaction effects on soil macropore geometry and related parameters for an arable field (2010, methodology): “This value is slightly higher than the value of 60 used for pores; it is similar to the value used by Gantzer and Anderson (2002). The fractal dimension for all images was obtained as the slope of the log–log plot of measured box count as a function of box size.”
Pore network complexity and thresholding of 3D soil images (2009, background): “Several authors stressed the need to define the appropriate pore-solid CT threshold, before calculating mass fractal and surface fractal dimensions (Baveye and Boast, 1998; Rogasik et al., 1999; Gantzer and Anderson, 2002; Perret et al., 2003; Rachman et al., 2005).”
Quantifying Soil Structure and Preferential Flow in Intact Soil Using X‐ray Computed Tomography (2008, unknown): “In recent years, CT has provided an attractive tool for soil scientists to noninvasively observe soil structure (Warner et al., 1989; Gantzer and Anderson, 2002; Perret et al., 1999) and solute transport (Anderson et al.”
Soil bulk density evaluation by conventional and nuclear methods (2005, methodology): “Introduction Soil bulk density is traditionally used as an indicator of soil structure (Gantzer and Anderson 2002) and soil compaction (Martı́nez and Zinck 2004; Reichardt and Timm 2004).”