Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization

By Tianyi Zhang, Faisal Ladhak, Esin Durmus, Percy Liang, K. McKeown, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023

820 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for automatic summarization but the reasons behind their successes are poorly understood. By conducting a human evaluation on ten LLMs across different pretraining methods, prompts, and model scales, we make two important observations. First, we find instruction tuning, not model size, is the key to the LLM’s zero-shot summarization capability. Second, existing studies have been limited by low-quality references, leading to underestimates of human performance and lower few-shot and finetuning performance. To better evaluate LLMs, we perform human evaluation over high-quality summaries we collect from freelance writers. Despite major stylistic differences such as the amount of paraphrasing, we find that LLM summaries are judged to be on par with human written summaries.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4a41319d5805a29316f24ed9519f09db77d4c29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  2. Yulia Tsvetkov
  3. Michael Lewis
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Yang Liu
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Yejin Choi
  8. Noah A. Smith

Citations in the corpus