Determination of elastic strain fields and geometrically necessary dislocation distributions near nanoindents using electron back scatter diffraction

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessment of geometrically necessary dislocation levels derived by 3D EBSD (2015, methodology): “Essentially two methods are commonly employed to come to a solution within an S-dimensional dislocation density space [30,29,5,6,10,16,31,12].”
Consistent determination of geometrically necessary dislocation density from simulations and experiments (2018, background): “Randman et al. (Wilkinson and Randman, 2010) and Ruggles et al. (2016) also observed that L1 minimisation generates an uneven distribution of GND density over individual slip systems.”
Crystal plasticity analysis of micro-deformation, lattice rotation and geometrically necessary dislocation density (2012, background): “…and for the determination of GND density, and their inclusion in modelling studies related to indentation size effects (Britton et al. 2010a; Wilkinson & Randman 2010), facet fatigue (Dunne et al. 2007a; Dunne & Rugg 2008) and micro-deformation (Cheong et al. 2005; Cheong & Busso 2006), for…”