Key management systems for sensor networks in the context of the Internet of Things

By Rodrigo Roman, Cristina Alcaraz, Javier López, Nicolas Sklavos. Computers & electrical engineering, 2011

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a49f205a35062d84b8c30fe50bc74217a79e21b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

Citations in the corpus

The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends (2014, methodology): “To enable encryption on the IoT, algorithms need to be made more efficient and less energyconsuming, and efficient key distribution schemes are needed (Bandyopadhyay and Sen 2011; Roman et al. 2011b; Yan and Wen 2012).”
Demystifying IoT Security: An Exhaustive Survey on IoT Vulnerabilities and a First Empirical Look on Internet-Scale IoT Exploitations (2019, background): “[88] distinguished four KMS classes: a key pool framework, a mathematical framework, a negotiation framework (i.”
The Internet of Things (2018, unknown): “Fridges that monitor and manage our nutritional goals [2], coffee mugs that sense their surroundings [3], wearable devices that measure our physiological state [4], and the ability to control sensor networks in water management plants [5] are no longer just a futuristic vision, or concepts created i”
Security and Privacy for Cloud-Based IoT: Challenges (2017, background): “proposed a key management system for sensor networks in the context of IoT [8] to achieve both the forward and backward secrecy while IoT users join and/or are revoked from their current communication group.”
Security for the Internet of Things: A Survey of Existing Protocols and Open Research Issues (2015, background): “The authors also discuss that mathematical-based key management solutions may also be adapted to support IoT applications [65].”
Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead (2015, background): “In [20] the authors argue that most of the KMS protocols are not suitable for IoT.”
IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges (2017, background): “The security analyses presented in [9, 10, 11] discuss and compare different key management systems and cyrptographic algorithms.”
The internet of things: a survey (2014, background): “Due to these advantages, SoA has been widely applied as a mainstream architecture for wireless sensors networks (Alcaraz and Lopez 2010; Roman et al. 2011; Roman and Lopez 2009).”
On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed internet of things (2013, background): “Also, in scenarios where clients and servers know each other in advance, it is also possible to use certain symmetric key-based protocols, which can provide good properties such as high resilience to attacks [39].”
A Survey of IoT-Enabled Cyberattacks: Assessing Attack Paths to Critical Infrastructures and Services (2018, background): “In a more speciﬁc context, Roman et al. [44] examine the applicability of existing key management schemes, either public-key or symmetric key ones, in WSNs.”