Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care
By M. Crawford, D. Rutter, C. Manley, T. Weaver, Kam Bhui, N. Fulop, P. Tyrer. British medical journal, 2002
1,030 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Medical Terminology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a49ded3f3af8303ab31d63fa60ef2d52bae154ed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- Patient Engagement as an Emerging Challenge for Healthcare Services: Mapping the Literature (2012, background): “The increasing attention to patient engagement and related topics is clearly shown by the growing number of publications from 2002 to 2012 thus suggesting that empowering patients to take an active role and to be engaged in their care has been internationally identified as a key factor in the drives”
- The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women's lives: a critical narrative review. (2013, background): “Such interventions should be collaboratively developed with patients, partners and support/information groups, tailored to the needs of specific groups of patients and robustly evaluated (Crawford et al., 2002).”
- Learning about service user involvement in mental health research (2004, background): “…resources, confusion about themeaning and purpose of service user involvement, resistance from professional staff, and an over-reliance on a small number of service users, sometimes to the detriment of their own health (Bowl, 1996; Pilgrim &Waldron, 1998; Crawford et al., 2002; Peck et al., 2002).”
- Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review (2018, background): “Increasing literature indicates that it is not only feasible to involve patients in the delivery or re-design of health care [9] but that such engagement can lead to reduced hospital admissions [27], improved effectiveness, efficiency and quality of health services [28–31], improved quality of life,”