Some remarks on the C^*-algebras associated with subshifts
By Toke Meier Carlsen, Kengo Matsumoto. 2004
63 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Neurology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a48b4c54b4a9473c81fb9e7ca6ffa8d885d43def
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Orr Shalit
- B. Solel
- Mikhailo Dokuchaev
- Gelu Popescu
- E. Shamovich
- Guy Salomon
- Michael Hartz
- K. Davidson
In Mathematical Physics
- Orr Shalit
- B. Solel
- Mikhailo Dokuchaev
- K. Davidson
- Gelu Popescu
- Elias G. Katsoulis
- E. Shamovich
- Guy Salomon
In Neurology
Citations in the corpus
- Recent developments around partial actions (2018, background): “ closed ∗-algebra of bounded operators on ℓ2(X) generated by {ug : g∈ F}.It follows by [118, Proposition 6.1] that MXcoincides with the C∗-algebra defined by K. Matsumoto in [231, Lemma 4.1] (see also [75]), and we call MX the Matsumoto algebra associated to X. Denoting by λthe left regular represent”
- Subproduct systems (2009, background): “The representation theory of Matsumoto’s subshift C-algebras In [27] Kengo Matsumoto introduced a class of C-algebras that arise from symbolic dynamical systems called “subshifts” (we note that in the later paper [16] Carlsen and Matsumoto suggest another way of associating a C-algebra with a subshi”
- Continuous orbit equivalence of topological Markov shifts and Cuntz-Krieger algebras (2007, unknown): “s diagonal algebra DA, that are studied in Section 7. The results of this paper will be generalized to more general subshifts and the C∗-algebras associated with the subshifts considered in [Ma1] (cf.[CM]) and [Ma3] in a forthcoming paper [Ma4]. Throughout the paper, we denote by Z+ and Nthe set of ”