Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech
By E. Holt. 2000
272 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4866aa6276422ad55ac6c78395c7f877d7c52d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Language and Linguistics
In Human-Computer Interaction
Citations in the corpus
- Formulating Actions and Events With Limited Linguistic Resources: Enactment and Iconicity in Agrammatic Aphasic Talk (2010, background): “Holt (1996 , 2000 ), for example, notes that in talk-in-interaction direct reported speech (DRS) can function not just to report a previous interaction but to provide evidence of what was actually said, and she observes that “DRS is often used to provide evidence by depicting the reported utterance”
- Coordinating Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments (2006, background): “A number of recent studies have drawn a similar distinction.4 In her study of reported speech in conversation, for instance, Holt (2000) suggested that in contrast to indirect reported speech, direct report “can be said to ‘show’ rather than ‘tell’ the recipient what was said and in doing so it…”
- Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity (2006, background): “…evidence that utterance verbs are used as epistemic phrases that (simply) frame the stance expressed in the actual direct speech that follows (see Holt 1996, 2000; Shoaps 1999; and Clift 2000 for the claim that reported speech can indirectly express the reporting speaker’s stance toward some…”
- Bodily Quoting in Dance Correction (2010, background): “The general advantage of quoting someone is that a quote claims to provide a virtual copy of relevant prior events, as has been argued by authors working on verbal quotes (Clark & Gerrig, 1990; Holt, 1996, 2000).”