Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception

By Marius Usher, Nick Donnelly. 1998

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Sjoerd van Steenkiste
2. Klaus Greff
3. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
4. Yoshua Bengio
5. Sergey Levine
6. Anirudh Goyal
7. Quoc V. Le
8. Mohit Bansal

Citations in the corpus

• On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networks (2020, background): “data in support of this interpretation relating synchronized oscillatory behavior of individual neurons to perceptual grouping (Usher and Donnelly, 1998; Tallon-Baudry and Bertrand, 1999), attention (Niebur et al.”
• Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? (1999, unknown): “…contour elements are bound perceptually and interpreted as elements of a coherent figure if they appear or change synchronously, while elements that follow different time courses are perceived as unrelated (Leonards et al., 1996; Usher and Donnelly, 1998; Alais et al., 1998; Lee and Blake, 1999).”
• Object-based visual attention for computer vision (2003, background): “Other pioneer research can be seen in the work of Humphreys and his colleagues [19,41,42], Grossberg [39], Behrmann [4], and a converged review [76].”