Dangerously few liaisons: a review of mate-finding Allee effects
By J. Gascoigne, Ludek Berec, S. Gregory, F. Courchamp. Population Ecology, 2009
317 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a47dc09d84d441b85b395fde1ffc5ab4f32ea443
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Andrew M. Kramer
- Brian Dennis
- John M. Drake
- Andrew M. Liebhold
- G. Heimpel
- M. Rhainds
- Mark K. Asplen
- Felix L. Wäckers
In Genetics
- John M. Drake
- Brian Dennis
- M. Rhainds
- G. Heimpel
- Andrew M. Liebhold
- Andrew M. Kramer
- Guiquan Sun
- David M. Lodge
Citations in the corpus
- The evidence for Allee effects (2009, methodology): “authors used a variety of terminology, all the mechanisms cited fit into eight broad categories (reviewed in Dennis 1989; Courchamp et al. 1999; Stephens and Sutherland 1999; Boukal and Berec 2002, unless otherwise cited): cooperative breeding, cooperative defense, cooperative feeding, dispersal (Ku”
- A ‘Goldilocks’ hypothesis for dispersal of biological control agents (2011, background): “, negative fitness functions with decreasing conspecific densities) (Stephens et al. 1999; Liebhold and Tobin 2008; Gascoigne et al. 2009).”
- Female mating failures in insects (2010, background): “Considering its limited empirical support, the mate encounter Allee effect should not be considered a principle of population ecology (Gascoigne et al., 2009), especially because several studies explicitly designed to detect its presence failed to do so (Kindvall et al., 1998; Fauvergue et al.,…”