Perforation of 12 mm thick steel plates by 20 mm diameter projectiles with flat, hemispherical and conical noses: Part II: numerical simulations

By T. Børvik, O. Hopperstad, Tor Jan Derek Berstad, M. Langseth. 2002

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a47cbc23fed439e89c6a3ee100960813772f206a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. T. Wierzbicki
2. T. Børvik
3. S. Dey
4. O. Hopperstad
5. X. Teng
6. Yingbin Bao
7. E. Flores-Johnson
8. L. Edwards

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. T. Børvik
2. O. Hopperstad
3. T. Wierzbicki
4. S. Dey
5. X. Teng
6. Yingbin Bao
7. E. Flores-Johnson
8. L. Edwards

In Materials Chemistry

1. T. Wierzbicki
2. X. Teng
3. O. Hopperstad
4. T. Børvik
5. Yingbin Bao
6. S. Dey
7. D. Mohr
8. Yuanli Bai

Citations in the corpus

• On the ballistic resistance of double-layered steel plates: An experimental and numerical investigation (2007, background): “Earlier studies have shown that the number of adaptive refinements should not be higher than about 100 to avoid numerical aberrations (Børvik et al., 2002).”
• Prediction of ductile crack formation in uncracked bodies (2003, background): “Extrapolating the function 87 (a, / 6) into small, zero or negative triaxialities, as it was done by Johnson and Cook [74] and Borvik et al [120] is a risky procedure that may lead to substantial errors.”