Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP.

By J. Vandervoort, R. Soetikno, T. Tham, R. Wong, A. Ferrari, H. Montes, A. Roston, A. Slivka, D. Lichtenstein, F. Ruymann and 3 more. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002

658 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4775b1e47bab260101226c9398a0f955282aa71

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oncology

1. M. Freeman
2. Suryakanth R. Gurudu

In Surgery

1. M. Freeman

Citations in the corpus

• Adverse events associated with ERCP. (2017, background): “Easy cannulation (<5 attempts) has a lower rate of PEP (3%) compared with moderately difficult cannulation (>6 attempts; PEP rate of 7%-9%) and difficult cannulation (>15-20 attempts; PEP rate of 13%-15%).(7,15) In these studies, difficult cannulation was an independent risk factor for PEP (OR 2.”
• Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Prospective Multicenter Study (2006, background): “Although there is an association with the number of times the papilla was manipulated, the cutoff numbers vary widely, with six attempts in two studies (11, 12) and 20 attempts in one study (13).”