Marker-Assisted Selection

By J. Kelly, Phillip N. Miklas. 2005

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4693f21f74900b9dfc192dc306f2664a9c62000

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Evaluation of genomic selection training population designs and genotyping strategies in plant breeding programs using simulation (2014, background): “Sampling is known to affect both marker assisted recurrent selection (Johnson, 2004) and genomic selection in biparental populations (Massman et al.”
Molecular marker-assisted breeding options for maize improvement in Asia (2010, background): “Maize seed companies have successfully exploited marker-QTL associations in population improvement and cultivar development (e.g., Johnson 2001, 2004; Eathington et al. 2007).”
Tagging and mapping of genes and QTL and molecular marker-assisted selection for traits of economic importance in bean and cowpea (2003, background): “Since the topic of the mapping and tagging of major disease resistance and other genes in bean was recently reviewed by the authors (Gepts, 1999; Kelly and Miklas, 1999), the present review will focus on CRSP-supported research on the development and current status of the integrated maps in bean and”
Inheritance of Flowering Time in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) and Analysis of Linked Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers (2011, unknown): “Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is particularly useful in cases where the evaluation of the traits is time-consuming as in tree crops with long juvenile periods (Arús and Moreno-González 1993).”
Molecular Markers and Marker-Assisted Breeding in Plants (2013, methodology): “…markers in biparental populations, first for QTL detection and then for MARS on yield (i.e. rapid cy‐ cles of recombination and selection based on associated markers for yield), could allow increased efficiency of long-term selection by increasing the frequency of favorable alleles (Johnson, 2004).”
Association Mapping for Enhancing Maize (Zea mays L.) Genetic Improvement (2011, methodology): “The markers are chosen based on linkage with traits of interest in the segregating population, and the index is used in (typically three) subsequent cycles of marker-based selection ( Johnson, 2004).”
Molecular Markers and Selection for Complex Traits in Plants: Learning from the Last 20 Years (2008, background): “This limitation in F2 enrichment is overcome in MARS, in which multiple cycles of selection are performed based on markers (Edwards and Johnson, 1994; Johnson, 2004; Eathington et al., 2007).”
Breeding in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.): strategic considerations (2005, background): “Morphological traits represent the first markers to be used in genetic mapping and have been used extensively in other crop species (Gepts et al., 1993; Kelly and Miklas, 1999).”
Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize (2007, background): “, winter) nursery, where phenotypic evaluations of maize are not meaningful but where three generations can be grown in 1 yr (Koebner, 2003; Johnson, 2004).”
Status and Prospects of Association Mapping in Plants (2008, unknown): “, F 2 , BC 1 , or three-way cross), marker-assisted recurrent selection (MARS) (Bernardo and Charcosset, 2006; Johnson, 2004) and genome-wide selection (GS) (Bernardo and Yu, 2007) can be implemented.”
Marker-Assisted Selection in Plant Breeding: From Publications to Practice (2008, background): “48, MARCH–APRIL 2008 in the private sector for maize (Johnson, 2004; Niebur et al., 2004; Eathington, 2005; Crosbie et al., 2006; Ragot and Lee, 2007) and soybean (Cregan et al.”
Designing dairy cattle breeding schemes under genomic selection: a review of international research (2012, methodology): “Stochastic models require populations to be simulated over a period of time that includes initially progeny testing and then genomic selection (Pedersen et al. 2009b; Winkelman and Spelman 2010; Buch 2011; de Roos et al. 2011; Lillehammer et al. 2011; Mc Hugh et al. 2011).”
Genomewide Selection versus Marker‐assisted Recurrent Selection to Improve Grain Yield and Stover‐quality Traits for Cellulosic Ethanol in Maize (2013, background): “6 WWW.CROPS.ORG CROP SCIENCE, VOL. 53, JANUARY–FEBRUARY 2013 grain yield decreased from Cycle 1 to Cycle 2 in two populations and grain moisture increased from Cycle 1 to Cycle 2 in three populations (Johnson, 2004).”