Comparison of molecular markers and coefficients of parentage for the analysis of genetic diversity among spring bread wheat accessions
By M. Almanza-Pinzon, M. Khairallah, P. Fox, M L Warburton. Euphytica, 2003
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4680e7732509204cdbcacb1e1f27e0d1e9480fe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jose Crossa
- Susanne Dreisigacker
- Marilyn Warburton
- M. Ginkel
- R. Graybosch
- P. Stephen Baenziger
- R. Trethowan
- A. McClung
Citations in the corpus
- Development of SSR-based sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) diversity research set of germplasm and its evaluation by morphological traits (2009, background): “Morphological traits or pedigree are important estimates of genetic diversity in crops but such information is usually found unrealistic and mostly influenced by environmental factors (Fufa et al. 2005; Alamnza-Pinzon et al. 2003 ).”
- Genetic erosion in crops: concept, research results and challenges (2009, background): “A discrepancy or a low correlation is found between the diversity values obtained using molecular markers and using pedigree information (Soleimani et al., 2002; Almanza-Pinzon et al., 2003).”
- A Rice Diversity Panel Evaluated for Genetic and Agro‐Morphological Diversity between Subpopulations and its Geographic Distribution (2011, background): “Estimates based on pedigree are generally inflated and often unrealistic (Cox et al., 1986; Souza and Sorrells, 1989; Almanza-Pinzon et al., 2003; Fufa et al., 2005), while phenotypic observations can provide a reasonable representation of overall genetic performance if they are based on…”
- Comparison of phenotypic and molecular marker-based classifications of hard red winter wheat cultivars (2005, methodology): “…were the highest (GDped = 1.00) and assuming no selection (which would cause similarly selected culti- vars to be more related) would have inflated genetic diversity values as was previously reported (Cox et al., 1985; Murphy et al., 1986; van Beuningen & Busch, 1997a; Almanza-Pinzon et al., 2003).”
- Improving Lives: 50 Years of Crop Breeding, Genetics, and Cytology (C‐1) (2006, methodology): “The value of genetic diversity estimates based on molecular markers is that they are believed to have better theoretical assumptions than many of the previous methods of genetic diversity (e.g., Almanza-Pinzon et al., 2003; Fufa et al., 2005).”
- Bringing wild relatives back into the family: recovering genetic diversity in CIMMYT improved wheat germplasm (2006, background): “Furthermore, many recent plant breeding efforts show a relative increase in diversity in many crops, including common wheat and durum wheat ( Almanza-Pinzon et al., 2003; Christiansen et al., 2002; Smale et al., 2002; Maccaferri et al., 2003; van Beuningen & Busch, 1997).”