Psychology of emotion: Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches.
By Paula M. Niedenthal, Silvia Krauth‐Gruber, François Ric. 2006
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a42de1e768a05f0fd8bb3a4c799f5bbd5d5b2482
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Didier Grandjean
- Klaus R. Scherer
- J. Crusius
- M. Zentner
- Ursula Hess
- Jens Lange
- A. Shirom
- Manuel F. Gonzalez
Citations in the corpus
- The construct validity of vigor and its antecedents: A qualitative study (2009, background): “A recent text (Niedenthal et al., 2006) provides a long list of researchers who defined affect as a collection of cognitive evaluation and labeling processes.”
- Is eye contact the key to the social brain? (2010, background): “Hence, we have been most influenced by emotion researchers who use the language of functionalism in a way that is relevant to humans and was initially motivated by responses to the idea that emotions disrupt reason and are generally harmful psychological events (Niedenthal et al. 2006).”
- Emotions evoked by the sound of music: characterization, classification, and measurement. (2008, background): “First, emotion components often do not cohere (Niedenthal et al., 2006).”
- Envy: An Adversarial Review and Comparison of Two Competing Views (2019, background): “The episodes differed in components that define emotions across theories (Keltner & Gross, 1999; Niedenthal & Ric, 2017): cognitions, feelings, goals, and action tendencies.”