Breaking through: The effects of a velocity distribution on barriers to dust growth

By F. Windmark, T. Birnstiel, C. Ormel, C. Dullemond. 2012

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It is unknown how far dust growth can proceed by coagulation. Obstacles to collisional growth are the fragmentation and bouncing barriers. However, in all previous simulations of the dust-size evolution in protoplanetary disks, only the mean collision velocity has been considered, neglecting that a small but possibly important fraction of the collisions will occur at both much lower and higher velocities. We study the effect of the probability distribution of impact velocities on the collisional dust growth barriers. Assuming a Maxwellian velocity distribution for colliding particles to determine the fraction of sticking, bouncing, and fragmentation, we implement this in a dust-size evolution code. We also calculate the probability of growing through the barriers and the growth timescale in these regimes. We find that the collisional growth barriers are not as sharp as previously thought. With the existence of low-velocity collisions, a small fraction of the particles manage to grow to masses orders of magnitude above the main population. A particle velocity distribution softens the fragmentation barrier and removes the bouncing barrier. It broadens the size distribution in a natural way, allowing the largest particles to become the first seeds that initiate sweep-up growth towards planetesimal sizes.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4160a4840e86f3bac1aec6f516b0355fd98d6f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Anders Johansen
  2. T. Birnstiel
  3. M. Fang
  4. E. Chiang
  5. Eve J. Lee
  6. Cecilia Ceccarelli
  7. P. Caselli
  8. Michiel Lambrechts

In Instrumentation

  1. Anders Johansen
  2. M. Fang
  3. Eve J. Lee
  4. Cecilia Ceccarelli
  5. G. Kovacs
  6. E. Chiang
  7. T. Birnstiel
  8. P. Caselli

Citations in the corpus