Nonlinear Schrodinger equation on real hyperbolic spaces

By Jean-Philippe Anker, Vittoria Pierfelice. 2008

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We consider the Schrodinger equation with no radial assumption on real hyperbolic spaces H n . We obtain in all dimensions n ⩾ 2 sharp dispersive and Strichartz estimates for a large family of admissible pairs. As a first consequence, we obtain strong well-posedness results for NLS. Specifically, for small initial data, we prove L 2 and H 1 global well-posedness for any subcritical power (in contrast with the Euclidean case) and with no gauge invariance assumption on the nonlinearity F. On the other hand, if F is gauge invariant, L 2 charge is conserved and hence, as in the Euclidean case, it is possible to extend local L 2 solutions to global ones. The corresponding argument in H 1 requires conservation of energy, which holds under the stronger condition that F is defocusing. Recall that global well-posedness in the gauge invariant case was already proved by Banica, Carles and Staffilani, for small radial L 2 data or for large radial H 1 data. The second application of our global Strichartz estimates is scattering for NLS both in L 2 and in H 1 , with no radial or gauge invariance assumption. Notice that, on Euclidean spaces R n , this is only possible for the critical power γ = 1 + 4 n and can be false for subcritical powers while, on hyperbolic spaces H n , global existence and scattering of small L 2 solutions hold for all powers 1 γ ⩽ 1 + 4 n . If we restrict to defocusing nonlinearities F, we can extend the H 1 scattering results of Banica, Carles and Staffilani to the nonradial case. Also there is no distinction anymore between short range and long range nonlinearities: the geometry of hyperbolic spaces makes every power-like nonlinearity short range.

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a415c044d633bc5920af79403ecd055ce7432505

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Mathematics

  1. M. Vallarino
  2. Jean-Philippe Anker
  3. Vittoria Pierfelice
  4. Gigliola Staffilani
  5. Benoit Pausader
  6. A. Ionescu
  7. Luc Molinet
  8. D. Tataru

In Mathematical Physics

  1. M. Vallarino
  2. Jean-Philippe Anker
  3. Vittoria Pierfelice
  4. Gigliola Staffilani
  5. Benoit Pausader
  6. A. Ionescu
  7. Zihua Guo
  8. Luc Molinet

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. M. Vallarino
  2. Benoit Pausader
  3. Jean-Philippe Anker
  4. Vittoria Pierfelice
  5. Gigliola Staffilani
  6. A. Ionescu

Citations in the corpus