Cognition in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE): The First 10 Years

By Martin Lövdén, Paolo Ghisletta, Ulman E. R. Lindenberger. 2004

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4065a2590c7db3dc4939d14e953f261f50c2204

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Ulman E. R. Lindenberger

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ulman E. R. Lindenberger
2. S. Schäfer
3. O. Huxhold
4. A. Diamond
5. Lucy Cragg

In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

1. O. Huxhold
2. S. Schäfer
3. Ulman E. R. Lindenberger

Citations in the corpus

• Longitudinal Cognition-Survival Relations in Old and Very Old Age 13-Year Data from the Berlin Aging Study (2006, unknown): “This finding replicates previous BASE results obtained with cross-sectional data (Baltes & Lindenbeger, 1997; Lindenberger & Baltes, 1994, 1997) and with fewer longitudinal observations (e.g., Ghisletta & Lindenberger, 2003, 2004; Lindenberger & Ghisletta, 2006; Lövdén et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2”
• Healthy mind in healthy body? A review of sensorimotor–cognitive interdependencies in old age (2006, background): “Testing this assumption empirically requires dramatic shifts in research strategy and statistical methodology that change the empirical base of developmental analyses from interindividual differences to intraindividual variations [50, 54, 55, 57, 58, 62, 64].”