Improving the Power of Tests of Stochastic Dominance

By Stephen G. Donald, Yu‐Chin Hsu. 2016

68 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a40368a093fb2c41c3ba1f10a03dbb26613ad8ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Aleksey Tetenov
2. Matt Goldman
3. David M. Kaplan
4. Susan Athey
5. Stefan Wager
6. Jörg Stoye
7. Guido W. Imbens
8. Xinkun Nie

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Matt Goldman
2. David M. Kaplan

Citations in the corpus

• Who should be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice (2015, background): “See Linton, Song, and Whang (2010) and Donald and Hsu (2016), as well as the literature on moment inequalities with moment selection (Andrews and Shi (2013), among others).”
• Comparing distributions by multiple testing across quantiles or CDF values (2017, methodology): “, Eicker, 1979, p. 117). Fourth, we provide a new formula to instantly compute our method as well as related goodness-of-fit p-values and uniform confidence bands for an unknown CDF. Fifth, we refine our basic method with stepdown and pre-test procedures to improve power without sacrificing strong c”