Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Ratings
By Najah Attig, Sadok El Ghoul, Omrane Guedhami, Jungwon Suh. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013
727 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3ed750480bf6d01e8fec2573cdc443aad998e44
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Sadok El Ghoul
- Omrane Guedhami
- M. Benlemlih
- Narjess Boubakri
- Jinhua Cui
- Mohammad Bitar
- H. Jo
- Najah Attig
In Finance
- M. Benlemlih
- Sadok El Ghoul
- Mohammad Bitar
- Narjess Boubakri
- Omrane Guedhami
- Najah Attig
- Haejung Na
- Si Xu
In Strategy and Management
- M. Benlemlih
- Sadok El Ghoul
- Omrane Guedhami
- Jinhua Cui
- Mohammad Bitar
- H. Jo
- Narjess Boubakri
- Hakkon Kim
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of corporate social performance on the cost of debt and access to debt financing for listed European non-financial firms (2017, methodology): “To do that, following previous literature, we included in our model the control variable Performance defined as Income before Extraordinary Items at time t divided for Sales at time t (Attig et al., 2013; Ge & Liu, 2015; Hoepner et al., 2016).”
- Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter? (2018, background): “, 2015), credit ratings (Attig et al., 2013), and tax avoidance (Huseynov and Klamm, 2012; Hoi et al.”
- When ESG meets AAA: The effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns (2021, neutral): “Furthermore, Jiraporn et al. (2014) and Attig et al. (2013) evidence that firms practising corporate social responsibility enjoy higher conventional credit ratings.”
- Inside the ESG Ratings: (Dis)Agreement and Performance (2020, neutral): “Attig et al. (2013) find evidence, on the basis of MSCI ESG STATS, that firms with good social performance benefit from relatively high ratings provided by credit rating agencies.”
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency (2016, positive): “As instruments, we use the initial level of a firm’s CSR score (CSR_INI, Attig et al. 2013), and the industry-year average of overall CSR scores (CSR_IND, El Ghoul et al. 2011).”
- Firm Internationalization and Corporate Social Responsibility (2014, positive): “Following their approach, we include long-term institutional ownership (LTIO) because previous research shows that long-term institutional investors play a role in corporate governance (e.g., Attig et al. 2013a).”
- Understanding the Impact of ESG Practices in Corporate Finance (2021, background): “In academia, Attig, Ghoul, Guedhami, and Suh [19] found that CSR strengths and concerns affect the credit rating of companies.”
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Debt Maturity (2015, unknown): “Finally, in line with this literature, Attig et al. (2013) provide strong evidence that socially responsible firms have low credit risk: rating agencies are likely to use non-financial information in their evaluation of firms’ credit worthiness, and to award relatively high ratings to firms with…”
- Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Information Asymmetry? (2016, background): “2011); CSR improves credit rating (Attig et al. 2013) and results in higher analyst forecast accuracy (Dhaliwal, et al.”
- On the Value of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Bond Issues in China (2018, background): “Attig et al. (2013) posit that credit rating agencies collect and process CSR-related information in assessing a firm’s creditworthiness. Jiraporn et al. (2014) also find that more socially responsible firms enjoy more favorable credit ratings.”