Tsunami science before and beyond Boxing Day 2004

By C. Synolakis, E. Bernard. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2006

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3d8dac1493311deaff478f18dc97dd3f8a3d0a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. D. Fuhrman
2. P. A. Madsen
3. H. Schäffer
4. David L. George
5. Randall J. LeVeque
6. Marsha J. Berger

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. D. Fuhrman

In Geophysics

1. H. Schäffer
2. P. A. Madsen
3. David L. George
4. Randall J. LeVeque
5. Marsha J. Berger
6. Stéphane Popinet

Citations in the corpus

• On the solitary wave paradigm for tsunamis (2008, background): “[10] In a recent review Synolakis and Bernard [2006] conclude that the work by Tadepalli and Synolakis [1994] at the time was controversial, for it was not reconcilable with the solitary wave paradigm.”
• Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods* (2011, background): “For some other discussions of this topic and possible test problems, see for example Synolakis and Bernard (2006) or Synolakis, Bernard, Titov, Kânoğlu and González (2008).”